Case Study|Food & Beverage

A leading animal nutrition supplier returned 2.09 to 1 and pulled labor hours down 4.5% by trading delayed monthly reports and reactive management for a real-time operating system and a workforce led to lead itself.

Animal Nutrition Supplier
Results at a Glance
2.09:1
Return on Investment
4.5%
Labor Hours Reduction
Executive Brief

Production rates lagged behind optimal levels, a quality-related setback had shaken morale and left employees fearing the operation might be cut back or shut down, and top-down management ran the floor on monthly KPIs that arrived late, with no real-time visibility to manage the day. Over a focused 20-week engagement, POWERS coached supervisors from reactive to proactive leadership, installed a Management Operating System spanning tiered goals, Daily and Weekly Operating Reports, centerlining, Pocket Card maintenance tracking, and Gemba walks, and stood up real-time quality and performance tracking through Hold Tags, hourly monitoring, and daily attainment. The engagement returned 2.09 to 1, labor hours fell 4.5%, cost per ton produced came down, downtime dropped on more reliable equipment, and a once-fearful workforce reported stronger morale, engagement, and sense of purpose.

Equipment Reliability · Frontline Leadership · MOS
The Situation

A quality setback had threatened both the operation's output and its confidence, and the team was managing a fast-moving plant on month-old numbers and reactive habits.

A leading animal nutrition supplier was working to recover from a quality-related setback that had threatened its production capabilities and rattled its people. Production rates consistently ran below optimal levels, and the setback had decreased morale to the point that employees feared the operation might be reduced or shut down. Leadership wanted two things at once: to lift production throughput and to build a culture of continuous improvement that would make the gains stick.

Underneath the throughput problem sat a structural one. Management was top-down and hierarchical, which limited frontline input and engagement, and the people closest to the work had little say in how it ran. KPIs were reported only monthly and arrived late, so the plant was effectively steering on month-old data with no real-time visibility to adjust the day. Those reporting delays slowed problem-solving and made quick course corrections nearly impossible. Supervisory roles were loosely defined and management was reactive rather than proactive, and a lack of goal clarity left daily responsibilities disconnected from the broader organizational objectives.

What the organization needed was not a one-time fix but a system: tighter visibility into performance as it happened, clearer ownership at the supervisor level, and a way to reconnect daily work to the goals it was meant to serve, all while rebuilding the confidence of a workforce that had been bracing for the worst.

The Diagnosis

Six structural gaps producing the same outcome from six directions.

Production rates stuck below optimal

Operational throughput consistently lagged behind optimal levels, leaving capacity and output on the table shift after shift.

Morale shaken by a quality setback

A quality-related setback had decreased morale, with employees fearing the operation might be cut back or shut down, which eroded the engagement needed to recover.

Top-down management closed off the floor

Hierarchical, top-down management limited frontline input and engagement, so the people closest to the work had little influence over how it ran.

KPIs reported monthly and late

Performance was reported only monthly and arrived with delays, leaving no real-time visibility to manage the day or correct course quickly.

Loosely defined, reactive supervision

Supervisory roles were loosely defined and management was reactive rather than proactive, so problems were absorbed instead of prevented.

Daily work disconnected from the goal

A lack of goal clarity left daily responsibilities unaligned with the broader organizational objectives, so effort did not consistently point at what mattered.

What POWERS Did

Paired a real-time operating system with a workforce coached to lead proactively from the floor.

POWERS started with leadership development and employee engagement. Supervisors were coached to transition from reactive to proactive management, a structured employee-recognition program with weekly awards gave the workforce visible reasons to engage, and daily Safety, Quality, Delivery, and Cost (SQDC) meetings created a standing forum where frontline input shaped the day. Together these reopened the channels that top-down management had closed and began rebuilding the confidence a quality setback had drained.

In parallel, POWERS installed a Management Operating System to give the plant real-time control. Tiered goal-setting connected annual targets all the way down to hourly expectations, restoring the goal clarity the operation lacked. Daily and Weekly Operating Reports (DWOR) replaced delayed monthly KPIs with performance insight as it happened, centerlining standardized production processes to reduce variation, daily Pocket Card tracking strengthened preventive maintenance, and regular Gemba walks kept leadership engaged directly with the frontline.

Layered on top, a real-time quality and performance tracking system closed the loop on accountability. A Hold Tag process gave quality issues a clear path to be caught and tracked, hourly monitoring of performance metrics replaced month-old reporting, and daily attainment tracking made ownership concrete. The cumulative effect was an operation that could see and adjust its performance by the hour: shift performance improved through PAVA and DWOR methodologies, maintenance grew more efficient under daily Pocket Card accountability, quality control tightened through the Hold Tag process, downtime fell as equipment reliability improved, cost per ton produced came down, and a more motivated, valued workforce found a stronger sense of purpose.

The Full Result

Two quantified gains, throughput and labor both earned through real-time control rather than new capital.

2.09:1
Return on Investment

The engagement returned 2.09 to 1, built on tighter throughput, lower labor hours, and a lower cost per ton rather than new capital.

4.5%
Labor Hours Reduction

Labor hours fell 4.5% as hourly monitoring, daily attainment tracking, and proactive supervision replaced delayed monthly reporting and reactive management.

Ready to builddisciplined execution in your operation?

Every POWERS engagement starts with our intensive Discovery Process. We work with everyone on your team, identify the gaps in the five disciplines that hold execution back, and build the partnership that closes them. The results stay built long after we’re gone.

Start a Conversation