Competing in the automotive aftermarket parts and accessories sector means defending efficiency while preparing for growth, and this manufacturer ran that race across two production facilities. Leadership recognized that to maintain operational efficiency and support future expansion, the way material and people moved through those plants had to improve.
The deeper problem was the layout itself. Designed for an earlier era of the operation, it had become a bottleneck: material flow congested near shipping and receiving, routes that forced unnecessary detours and excessive handling, and high interaction between personnel and equipment in tight, busy areas. Each of these eroded throughput, and together they posed real safety risks on a floor never configured for the current volume.
What leadership needed was not a one-time fix to a single aisle but a systematic rethink of the floor, one that could relieve congestion, separate people from forklift traffic, raise productivity, and leave headroom to scale. That called for a structured assessment grounded in how the facilities actually ran, not assumptions about how they were drawn.