Case Study|Consumer Products

One of Puerto Rico's largest distributors lifted receiving productivity 64% and picking productivity 35% while cutting overtime 16%, turning an undisciplined, metric-poor warehouse into one run on numbers and engaged frontline leadership.

One of Puerto Rico's Largest Distributors
Results at a Glance
64%
Receiving Productivity
35%
Picking Productivity
16%
Overtime Reduction
Executive Brief

A long-established distribution leader moving beverage, food, household, personal care, and pet goods across Puerto Rico hit unprecedented customer demand just as its warehouse pick makeup shifted from mostly pallets to mostly cases. Performance had not adjusted, the facility lacked process discipline, it managed off few and often inaccurate metrics, and leadership was not engaging the workforce or holding it accountable. POWERS evaluated the distribution center across inbound, picking, outbound, and layout, built frontline leadership coaching protocols, created a staffing plan by work area that let departments flex employees where demand was, defined the right KPIs, and implemented a metrics tracking and management system. Receiving productivity rose 64%, picking productivity rose 35%, outbound productivity rose 7%, and overtime fell 16%.

Frontline Leadership · MOS · Supply Chain
The Situation

A distribution leader known for performance and integrity hit unprecedented demand with a warehouse that had quietly stopped matching the work in front of it.

One of Puerto Rico’s largest distributors, the company supplies beverage, food, household, personal care, and pet goods across the island and is renowned for setting standards of performance and integrity in distribution. When unprecedented customer demand and rapidly changing market conditions arrived at once, that reputation was tested: the operation had to stay competitive and satisfy diverse, shifting customer needs at a pace it had not faced before.

Inside the warehouse, the nature of the work had changed. The pick makeup had moved from primarily pallet-picking to mostly case-picking, a far more labor-intensive profile, and performance had not adjusted to it. The facility lacked discipline in its processes and was missing several methods needed to manage the warehouse efficiently. That inefficiency forced the company to hire additional employees just to keep up, driving overall operating cost higher.

The deeper problem was that leadership could not see the business clearly or lead it consistently. The distribution center had few performance metrics to manage by, and the information it did report was often inaccurate, so decisions ran on a thin and unreliable picture. The leadership team did not engage well with employees from a culture standpoint, there were no formal meetings to set expectations, and supervisors held no accountability to the workforce. With demand forecasts expecting a decrease as pandemic-related benefits ended, the distributor needed a system that would hold up through changing volume, not a one-time push.

The Diagnosis

Six structural gaps producing the same outcome from six directions.

A pick makeup the operation never caught up to

The warehouse shifted from primarily pallet-picking to mostly case-picking, a more labor-intensive profile, but performance was never adjusted to match it. The operation kept running as if the work had not changed.

Process discipline and methods missing

The facility lacked discipline in its processes and was missing several methods needed to manage the warehouse efficiently. Without them, output depended on individual effort rather than a repeatable system.

Inefficiency paid for with extra headcount

To keep up with demand, the company hired additional employees to cover for the inefficiency rather than fix it. That raised overall operating cost without resolving the underlying problem.

Few metrics, and the ones reported were unreliable

The distribution center had few performance metrics from which to manage the business, and the information it did report was often inaccurate. Leadership was steering a high-volume operation on a thin, unreliable picture.

Leadership disengaged from the workforce

The leadership team did not engage well with employees from a company-culture standpoint. That distance left the floor without the consistent direction strong performance depends on.

No expectations set, no accountability enforced

There were no formal meetings to set expectations and no accountability from supervisors to the workforce. With no one closing the loop, performance had no mechanism to hold.

What POWERS Did

Brought metric-driven discipline and engaged frontline leadership to the distribution center.

POWERS started by evaluating the critical areas of the distribution center for improvement, working across inbound, picking, outbound, and warehouse layout. That gave a clear, fact-based view of where the operation was losing ground and which methods and routines the warehouse needed to manage the new, case-heavy pick profile efficiently rather than absorb it with more headcount.

Several workstreams advanced in parallel. POWERS developed frontline leadership coaching protocols so leaders engaged more effectively with their teams, set expectations, and held the floor accountable. It created a staffing plan by work area to manage personnel and overtime, designed so departments could flex employees into other areas as demand moved, directly attacking the cost that inefficiency had been adding. At the same time, POWERS determined the KPIs needed to actually measure performance, including productivity, carrier on-time arrival, and picking accuracy, and implemented a metrics tracking and management system to make that information accurate and visible.

Together, the changes replaced an undisciplined, metric-poor operation with one that could see itself clearly and lead consistently. Productivity climbed across receiving, picking, and outbound, overtime came down as staffing flexed to where the work was, and the distributor gained the metrics and leadership routines to keep improving even as demand forecasts shifted with the end of pandemic-related benefits.

The Full Result

Four measurable gains, earned by matching the work to the right methods, metrics, and staffing rather than more headcount.

64%
Receiving Productivity

Receiving productivity rose as KPIs, a staffing plan by work area, and frontline coaching replaced an undisciplined, metric-poor operation.

35%
Picking Productivity

Picking productivity rose as the shift from pallet to case picking was finally matched with the right methods and staffing.

16%
Overtime Reduction

Overtime fell as a staffing plan by work area let departments flex employees to where the demand was.

7%
Outbound Productivity

Outbound productivity rose as accurate metrics and clearer expectations tightened the back end of the operation.

Ready to builddisciplined execution in your operation?

Every POWERS engagement starts with our intensive Discovery Process. We work with everyone on your team, identify the gaps in the five disciplines that hold execution back, and build the partnership that closes them. The results stay built long after we’re gone.

Start a Conversation